Monday, April 26, 2010

Wal-Mart facing troubles?

Wal-Mart facing huge pay discrimination suit.

While the article points out that the court ruling was a "sharply divided" one (6-5), I take away from this:

-Wal-mart has lost on this issue three times already

-Their defense seems to rest on the fact that the problem is too big for them to defend.

It also seems to me, that if the 6 defendants are not representative enough to enjoy (or, in this case, initiate) class-action status, then that will make it that much harder for them to prove their point that Wal-mart has a pervasive and discriminatory policy with regard to the treatment of its female employees.

But there you go.

Can't let a thing like a law get in the way of raising funds...

RNC on anti-deceptive mailer law: "It doesn't apply to us."

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

The Accidental Sex Offender

This piece by Wendy Kaminer deserves much more than a passing mention in my blog. And I've thought about it quite a bit and cannot disagree with a word she says. My response, then: Ditto.

Yup, that's right

Via Andrew Sullivan:

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Cincinnati pitcher "suspended" 50 games

50 game ban, BUT they let him serve it while he is rehabbing.

WTF! A SP pitcher only only has to sit out about 20% of the games anyway. What is the point of such a toothless penalty? This is like a school suspension that counts weekend days.

Of course they are, John

John McCain: "Illegal immigrants are intentionally causing accidents on the freeways."

[Insert snarky response here]

How the Right has re-defined "judicial restraint" to mean "judicial activism against law we don't like."

A great piece on how the Right has re-defined "judicial restraint" to mean "judicial activism against law we don't like."

[D]uring the Warren era, activism usually meant asking the Supreme Court to bring a few state outliers into line with a national consensus—on racial discrimination, for example. By contrast, Roberts Court-era conservatives are urging unelected judges to strike down landmark federal laws that passed over their objections, at least some of which command broad national support.

SCOTUS opening

The GOP has already come out against whoever it is that Obama will nominate to replace Stevens on the bench.

The White House response has been that the solid GOP opposition frees him to pick whoever he wants, without bothering to even talk with them.

Probably not the response they were hoping for...

Dead and dying languages...

A linguist friend of mine muses about being a terminal speaker.

Reminds me of the listverse post, 12 Last Known Speakers of a Language.

"Lost" IPhone or devious plant?

IPhone prototype found in California bar.